Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin has strongly criticized the central government over the ongoing debate surrounding the National Education Policy’s (NEP) three-language policy. In his comments, Stalin argued that the forced imposition of Hindi has “swallowed” 25 North Indian languages over the years, contributing to the decline of ancient mother tongues. The DMK-led government in Tamil Nadu is at odds with the Centre over the inclusion of Hindi, which is a central issue in the policy. Stalin emphasized that the promotion of Hindi as the sole unifying language threatens India’s linguistic diversity.
Stalin’s Criticism of the Hindi-Only Agenda
In a letter shared on social media platform X, Stalin addressed the issue head-on, stating that Hindi’s rise in the educational system and its forced adoption has resulted in the erasure of numerous regional languages. He said, “The push for a monolithic Hindi identity is what kills ancient mother tongues. UP and Bihar were never just ‘Hindi heartlands.’ Their real languages are now relics of the past.”
The Tamil Nadu CM’s remarks shed light on the long-standing concerns regarding the marginalization of languages like Bhojpuri, Maithili, and others that have historically been spoken in the north. Stalin argued that Hindi’s dominance in education and government has led to the decline of these languages, many of which now struggle to survive in today’s India.
Languages Facing Extinction
Stalin further explained that the push for Hindi as the dominant language of communication is systematically pushing other languages to the brink of extinction. He listed several languages that are currently “gasping for survival,” including Bhojpuri, Maithili, Awadhi, Braj, Bundeli, Garhwali, Kumaoni, Magahi, Marwari, Malvi, Chhattisgarhi, Santhali, Angika, Ho, Kharia, Khortha, Kurmali, Kurukh, and Mundari, among others.
“Many of these languages were once the vibrant modes of communication in their regions, but now they are scarcely spoken,” Stalin noted. He warned that the Centre’s push for Hindi will further marginalize these languages, pushing them closer to extinction and causing a loss of cultural heritage.
The Three-Language Policy Controversy
The three-language policy under the NEP has been a subject of heated debate since its introduction. The policy requires the teaching of three languages in schools, with Hindi being a mandatory inclusion in non-Hindi speaking states. Tamil Nadu, however, has expressed strong opposition to this mandate, citing concerns over linguistic diversity and regional autonomy. Stalin has been vocal in his objections, arguing that the policy threatens the state’s cultural identity and violates the constitutional principles of federalism.
The DMK-led government in Tamil Nadu has consistently argued that imposing Hindi on non-Hindi speaking states goes against the principles of linguistic diversity enshrined in India’s Constitution. Stalin’s criticism of the Centre’s approach echoes the long-standing concerns of regional parties in the state, which have historically opposed any attempts to impose Hindi over the Tamil language.
A Call for Protection of India’s Linguistic Heritage
In his letter, Stalin emphasized the need for policies that promote and protect India’s rich linguistic heritage. “Our country is home to over 2,000 languages, and each one is an integral part of our identity. To preserve this diversity, we must ensure that no single language is imposed on all,” Stalin said. He further stressed that promoting multilingualism and safeguarding regional languages is vital for maintaining India’s cultural richness.
Stalin’s position also resonates with a broader debate about the importance of linguistic rights in a diverse nation like India. While Hindi is one of the official languages of the Union, many feel that the push for its dominance in education and administration disregards the country’s multilingual reality.
MK Stalin’s strong stance against the Centre’s three-language policy highlights the growing tensions between the Tamil Nadu government and the central administration over linguistic issues. With the rise of regionalism in India, leaders like Stalin continue to voice concerns over the survival of regional languages and the potential dangers of a homogenized national identity. As the debate continues, many are calling for a more inclusive approach that respects India’s linguistic diversity and ensures the survival of all languages, big or small.
The controversy surrounding the NEP and the future of India’s languages is far from over. The situation calls for dialogue and understanding, with the preservation of linguistic heritage at the forefront.
For more updates on the NEP and language issues, visit Coleman News.
